Note for Liberals & Progressives Assuming Every Trump Voter Sided Against the Vulnerable
Please, Follow the Silenced (.com). Are they not vulnerable humans deserving of care? And are you sure gov't enabled child trafficking is only "conspiracy theory"?
[This may be too long to fit in one email - but shorter than my previous articles(!) Please click the headline to read it on Substack]
“We ALL should try to take the high road (inconceivable though that may be), and join forces to bring down our REAL enemies, who are really neither left nor right, but sway them both, from high above” - Mark Crispin Miller
Summary
It’s fair to accuse team Trump of lack of empathy, and to find some of their policies dangerous, (after trying to differentiate media spin from reality as much as possible).
What’s not fair is to assume everyone who voted for Trump, or against team Harris, did so from lack of empathy / from choosing the path of greatest suffering for others.
Those who feel sure that the current administration has only increased human suffering, and that all who voted them in are indifferent, or worse, to human suffering, are invited to consider -
Under “Biden”, the US government actively, knowingly, participated in trafficking of children, for labor and for sex. This is not a conspiracy theory.
The documentary “Follow the Silenced” (FollowTheSilenced.com) is free to watch and also free to download. It shows the pain and misery endured by the COVID vaccine injured. They suffered while being censored, abandoned, and dehumanized. I encourage everyone to watch it. Studies, numbers, and charts, while there are plenty of them, don’t come close to what’s expressed by seeing and listening to real people.
Trump is not innocent in regards to COVID vaccine injury, but it was “Biden” who forced the cruel choice of “jab or job” (or school, and in some cases, medical care). Also, the heartless tragedy of coordinated censorship was done by the “Biden” White House. This denied everyone informed consent, leading to more devastated bodies and lives - and then censored / deplatformed the injured and grieving from sharing their stories and even connecting with each other. And conflated reasonable vaccine risk awareness - that was correct all along - with “violent extremism” and “domestic terrorism”.
These two tragedies represent tremendous suffering, of millions of human beings, and were factors in the election.
Liberals and progressives overlook these (and other) factors when trying to make sense of why people went “to the dark side”. They start from a pre-determined certainty of one side being obviously more caring and ethical but have blind spots about some of the most evil actions that side has done.
These blind spots lead to division, dehumanization, judgement, becoming what they claim to oppose, and drains energy from what could be chances to learn with humility. And goes around the most gaping wound in the collective consciousness - as the indifference to it by some collides with more clear evidence mounting to must-be-noticed levels (films years in the making, studies that can finally get through the gates, etc).
This judgement (of anyone not loyal to the left, especially those who once were) also impedes collaborations to stop some of the most dangerous impending policies.
** If you’re trying to make sense of why people who come from the left supported Kennedy, voted for Trump, and / or refused to vote for Harris, and you haven’t digested that the COVID vaccines are not just “not as effective as advertised, nor perfectly safe, and Pharma made too much money” - but bad enough where “crime against humanity” is *not* an exaggeration - you’re missing a momentous foundation of this inflection point / political inversion.
Betrayal of the Sacred Covenant
There’s a lot of blame and scapegoating in progressive / liberal spaces. Anger at anyone whose vote - or, especially, whose actions and influence - helped pave the way to the road we’re on now.
Depending on perspective, information diet, and ability to challenge one’s prior beliefs, the road we’re on now is either -
Speeding towards a Nazi Christo fascist authoritarian dictatorship hellscape, where billionaires, polluters, technocrats and hateful racists impoverish, imprison, and destroy everything and everyone besides the richest of their master race. Women will be reduced to breeding machines, with no bodily autonomy.
Or, from a different perspective -
We’ve begun a long-overdue rebalancing of absurd excess1, where there is less discrimination towards Christians and white people2. From this perspective, people are now safer, the innocence of childhood is respected, bodily autonomy is respected, and America is respected. Our - surely infinite, just keep drilling, baby! - manufacturing and drilling potential will be used to its full capacity, leading to prosperity - all while easily protecting the air, land, and “beautiful, beautiful, water”. The People’s Warrior is rockin’ deals all over the world, and it’s all just going to be … Great.
~~
This may sound unbelievable, but there are plenty of people not loyal to either narrative, who see blind spots and contradictions in both. Who thoughtfully parse out accuracy from exaggerations as much as possible, while admitting there’s much we don’t know.
I think this explanation by longtime progressive Mark Crispin Miller (exiled from his tribe for daring to notice the propaganda his career is built on understanding) is closest to objective reality ~
“What Trump has done, in short, is build on rational and even necessary policies—deporting foreign criminals, pushing back on DEI, protecting kids from mutilation, saving taxpayers money—to go hog-wild across the board, and without clearly saying why … In other words, he almost always doubles down …”
I don’t know Mr. T and I won’t speculate what’s in, or not in, his heart.
But it’s understandable to assume someone who conflates getting criminals and terrorists out of our country (yes, please) with throwing random men in brutal confinement centers based on common tattoos, or on nothing at all (WTF???) has some issues around empathy.
What’s frustrating, though, is the assumption that everyone who had a part in getting The Bad Man elected, including Kennedy supporters who didn’t condemn him for “making a deal with the devil”, also lack empathy.
The assumption seems to be that Trump voters knowingly voted to harm many more vulnerable people, who would not have been harmed under (whatever puppets) Harris.
Did I just say no vulnerable people are being / will be wrongly hurt under a Trump administration??
No. That’s not what I said.
Between increased pollution of water and air3, to potential reductions in Medicaid and Medicare, to trying to eliminate due process while conflating “deportation” with being locked in a barbaric confinement center, etc., there’s a lot of harm this government is doing / can do.
But those most angry, scared, loud, judgmental and hateful towards anyone who sees things differently seem to not grasp how much harm the government was doing before. Perhaps because it’s just so ghastly, it can hardly be believed. So it’s written off as “conspiracy theory”, or “rare”. “If it must not be, it cannot be.”
~~~
“We Sent 329 Children to One Address”
- Deborah White, whistleblower from an emergency intake shelter in California, The Free Press
Prediction: These articles propaganda signals minimizing something as serious as child trafficking will not age well - “RFK Jr Pushes Conspiracy HHS Forced Kids Into Slavery”. (The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, and Rolling Stone - of course. But they all get the same talking points from the same headwaters - that are so polluted they can’t even respect victims of child trafficking or how much healing potential could happen if the media took this information seriously, understanding how not-rare it is.)
One of the things voted against when voting against whatever is behind “Biden” and Harris, was government-sponsored sex and slave trafficking of children.
“There is no question that the border crisis is the primary reason for the increase in the sex trafficking of migrants.”
“I ask her if the sex trafficking of migrant girls had increased since the Biden administration threw open the border, leading to 8 million migrants crossing the southern border since 2021. “Yes,” she says. “Nearly all of my sex-trafficking rings now are migrant girls. The ads exploded within the first three months of the border being open. We started noticing new sites and ads in Spanish. That was very few before. Then sites dedicated to Latino girls popped up everywhere.” Since the border opened, Lisa added, over 90 percent of the ads are for migrant girls.
“ . . . forced labor and prostitution among underage migrants more than tripled under President Biden, reaching record highs. And that only counted the handful who had escaped—not the thousands who were still held by the traffickers, the ones Lisa was searching for.” - Madeleine Rowley, The Free Press
It’s a sad state of affairs when “government-sponsored sex and slave trafficking of children” is an actual thing.
But since it is, since the US government was, yes, a “child trafficking delivery service” - and that situation was, perhaps more than any other, likely to be different between candidates - more people than you may realize figured that into calculations of who to vote for.
“There is no question that the border crisis is the primary reason for the increase in the sex trafficking of migrants. Here’s how it works: When underage migrants cross the border unaccompanied by a family member, they are sent to a temporary holding facility run by one of a number of nonprofit organizations operating at the border. The NGOs are expected to move the migrants out within a couple of weeks because there are so many more coming in right behind them. During the time the migrants are in the holding facility, both the NGOs and the government are supposed to vet the people who will take them when they depart. These people are called sponsors, and the vast preference of everyone in the system is that they be relatives already living in the U.S.
But sometimes an underage migrant doesn’t have a family sponsor, which gives the cartels and gangs their opening. They pretend to be legitimate sponsors, and with the pressure on the NGOs and the government to move the migrants through the system quickly, gang members—who usually have their hooks into the migrant well before they’ve crossed the border—are accepted as sponsors.
How do they get away with this? They fill out applications in illegible handwriting, guessing (often correctly) that no one will look at it closely. They coach the girl or boy to say that their sponsor is a cousin or an uncle. And they take advantage of the fact that the federal agency overseeing migrant relocation, the Office of Refugee Resettlement—or ORR—is notoriously negligent in vetting sponsors.” - Madeleine Rowley, The Free Press
There’s been ample evidence for years that this has been going on, from whistleblowers who worked for the government, (also here, and here), and from journalists exposing children’s unanswered desperate calls to help lines and how toothless “wellness checks” were as little as making one phone call and giving up if the phone wasn’t answered, and an in person visit where the officer walked away when told by the wife that her husband is abusing the child. And children being given to men who were on criminal watchlists, and sponsors raping children and then being given more children.
The number of children who were delivered into misery can be disputed, but a low estimate from the Office of the Inspector General says at least 291,000 unaccompanied migrant children were released by HHS and are now missing / unaccounted for. It may be up to half a million children.
Open borders +
Un/ poorly vetted sponsors +
Rushing unaccompanied children through =
Openings exploited by predators, that the US government knew about =
Child trafficking, sponsored by the US government and affiliated NGOs, +
Border patrol turned into Uber drivers for the cartels, as Tulsi Gabbard observed.
Might there be some independent sleuths certain they’re on to a child trafficking ring based on nebulous information, and turn out to be overzealous and wrong? Never said there weren’t.
And are there some migrant children now in the US, lovingly cared for by relatives, or trustworthy friends of their family, grateful they were allowed into the US and transported to a safe, loving home? Yes.
But it’s also reality - creepy, dark, real reality, that Health and Human Services and Department of Homeland Security were knowing facilitators of delivering unaccompanied migrant children into a miserable life of sexual and labor slavery.
This is not just Q-Anon. Whatever that even is.
“Nobody gets a kid until they prove they are a family member”
“Under the Biden administration, the Federal Government became the biggest facilitator of child abuse in our country. My predecessor prioritized speed over safety. In stark contrast, this administration is putting a halt to the child trafficking problem. We are fingerprinting every sponsor, DNA testing, income testing and valid ID testing. Nobody gets a kid until they prove they are a family member.” - HHS Secretary Kennedy
“The most significant change is that all potential sponsors must be fingerprinted, and the fingerprints must be sent to the FBI to check for criminal records. No child will be released to a sponsor until their fingerprints are recorded in the unaccompanied child’s file. In addition, all identification documents must be legible and unexpired.
Critics of the Trump administration’s immigration policy complain that cumbersome fingerprinting and identification rules could delay the vetting of sponsors, leading to a backlog and overcrowding in shelters that house unaccompanied children.” - Madeleine Rowley, The Free Press
Question for those critics - which would you consider the less-bad option if you were one of those children - waiting in an overcrowded shelter, or years of being raped in every orifice, up to 30 times a day?
Low Bar, Heavy Weight
Not intentionally sending children to a torturous life of sex / labor trafficking shouldn’t be something that sets one candidate apart from another - it shouldn’t be happening that the government of any country is doing this. Especially not the one determined to spread its grand moral authority around the world.
But it is. And common-sense vetting of sponsors for unaccompanied children is not a high bar, and it doesn’t mean that everything else that president / administration does is fair, compassionate, or not dangerous.
But it does weigh (very) heavy on the thoughts of people aware of this tragedy, when considering who to vote for, and who to vote against.
Which makes it especially exasperating, if that was part of a calculation in voting, to then be framed as having no care for the vulnerable, because voted for Bad Man.
There are many similarities between the Democrats in the US and the and Labour government in the UK. This is what they’re dealing with over there. And sometimes, posting about the tragedy of rape gangs is met with a harsher reaction from authorities than violating children.
“From Plymouth to Carlisle, these networks trafficked and brutalised little white girls in every corner of the country. In some cases, they were transported hundreds of miles for pre-arranged exchanges.” - JJ Starky
Common Threads - Who Does the Media Mock?
“‘Sound Of Freedom’ Is a Superhero Movie for Dads With Brainworms
The QAnon-tinged thriller about child-trafficking is designed to appeal to the conscience of a conspiracy-addled boomer” - article by Miles Klee, Rolling Stone
Also from Miles Klee, in the “journalism that speaks truth to power” Rolling Stone, January 7, 2025 - “The R-Word’s Comeback Is a Grim Sign of Our Political Moment”
Now somehow finding feigning compassion, Klee laments, “Disability advocates are concerned by the resurgence of an epithet that is now wielded by ‘anti-woke’ crusaders”
To those who didn’t memory-hole the other greatest tragedy of the last few years, there’s something disingenuous about this.
Please don’t misunderstand - I’m not a fan of insulting the disabled.
But Miles Klee seems to be. This is about Klee writing in Rolling Stone about an online trend mocking the vaccine injured, after a nurse posted a video of her tremors, caused by severe neurological injury.
“ . . . he’s just one of a horde of journalists who caved to political pressures and ended up doing Big Pharma’s bidding and now provides free propaganda for billion-dollar biomedical companies that continue to profit from this virus.
Third, he chose to target and disparage a nurse—of all people!—without ever asking her if she could validate her claims. In my opinion, that final breach of journalistic ethics should be career ending. But we’re living in Orwellian times. . .
I’m told that reporters don’t write the headlines, but Klee’s headline prepares you for a bunch of sentences that deny medical facts: ‘Claims of Covid Vaccine Injuries and Deaths Revive Protest Movement.’ But what does this title and Klee’s article not tell you? Like all medical interventions, vaccines have side effects.
Here’s one Klee excerpt that explains little, while causing nothing but offense:
Social media has lately seen a resurgence of videos purporting to show vaccine recipients suffering tremors or seizures. Similar content dates back to 2021 and went especially viral in May 2022, when Twitter user Angelia Desselle posted footage of her feet shaking, with the caption “Thanks Pfizer.” (Spasms are not a proven side effect of the vaccines; these claims have been widely mocked and parodied.)
The problem is that Rolling Stone failed to verify the claim that the vaccines don’t cause spasms. When you click on the link for the alleged ‘mocked and parodied’ it doesn’t lead to a medical study or credible government health agency. It takes you to the website ‘Know your meme.’ (I’m not kidding. This is Klee’s proof. Read his article and click the link.)
What Klee and his editor should have done is basic due diligence: reach out to Desselle and ask her to provide evidence to support her claim, instead of mocking someone who says they had a medical side effect. Isn’t that what journalists are supposed to do?
Instead, Klee and his editor chose wording to say spasms are not a “proven” side effect of the vaccines, and then lambasted Desselle by including a link to social media trolls making fun of her neurological injury. . . .
After reading Klee’s article, I checked the CDC Wonder / VAERS database and found more than 22,000 people have reported tremors/spasms after receiving an mRNA COVID vaccine. (As of January 2023)
Klee failed to do this basic act of reporting, and the negligence by Rolling Stone only prolonged the suffering of nurse Angelia Desselle by propagating nonsense and fueling internet trolls. She deserves better. Every nurse educating the public deserves better.
Every human injured by pharmaceutical products deserves better.” - Lindsay Jones, The Disinformation Chronicle
Yes, it really happened that an internet trend made dance videos to make fun of people whose bodies were shaking after being vaccinated - a common symptom of neurological injury, dismissed, with the media’s help, as “conspiracy theory”.
This is Team Compassion, Team Left, Team We Care About the Vulnerable.
And that can’t be forgotten.
FollowTheSilenced.com - Free to Watch & Download
Another topic weighing heavily on calculations to vote against the team who opened the border and handed children to whomever asked for them, were COVID vaccine mandates. And the plight of the vaccine injured. Which was, of severely injured, approximately one in 800.
Employees of the Harris campaign were required to be “up to date” on an obscene number of COVID shots, in 2024, when it was long-obvious the shots had no ability to prevent infection / transmission. What may she (whatever tells her what to do) have done with the power of directing the entire country?
Yes, Trump called himself the “Father of the Vaccine” and encouraged people to take it. However he was misled by those around him - and he was - it’s indefensible to promote a product so new and experimental without personally learning enough about it to understand what one is recommending.
But - again, low bar, heavy weight - Trump always said it should be a choice, not forced at penalty of loosing one’s job or access to school or medical care. To the people now living with permanent disability from a vaccine or booster they only took because of the mandates, it doesn’t matter to them if Trump’s reasoning is based in ethics, ego, or some combination thereof. Perhaps his resistance to mandates is based entirely in ego - his supporters would turn on him if he mandated the most dangerous vaccine ever to be widely distributed.
It’s not that Trump supporters are anti-science sociopathic disease spreaders, it’s that after seeing how brazenly the media lied (“Russia!!” “What laptop?”), they went into COVID with more skepticism, while most of the left, strung along by a blend of genuine and performative compassion, which wasn’t even applicable as the inverted narrative claimed, were easily manipulated to trust everything the media said. Including the murderous lies that early treatment - which worked all along - was a Republican conspiracy and the only solution was wait for the vaccine.
Another difference is how intensely the “Biden” administration did everything possible to shut down discussion and sharing of true stories, like the human beings the film Follow the Silenced listens to.
They went beyond censorship to conflating vaccine risk awareness, and the (true) perspective that the COVID response was about more than controlling a (treatable since day one) virus, with “violent extremism”.
Follow the Silenced is free to watch and download.
Please, watch the film with an open heart. Time is scarce for all, it is an investment in (apx 90 minutes) of time.
Yet if you’re currently holding - especially tightly - to the assumption that Trump voters sided with the powerful and exploitive over vulnerable victims of an out-of-control government, I invite you to listen directly to the people whose government censored the info they needed for informed consent. They also censored their support groups, and tried to erase the truth of their existence, and conflated speaking / posting about vaccine risk awareness with “domestic terrorism”. They lied all the way down, from the clinical trial data to their promises to you.
(At least, watch the four-minute trailer.)
Some were injured under the watch of Team Trump. At least, the Trump White House wouldn’t have chosen to take down the Facebook groups where the injured found each other, or made it so hard to learn that early treatment works. To some permanently disabled and grieving, that would have made all the difference.
Studies showing the multiple harms of these injections don’t capture the human element of the lives shattered by false promises - and the tragedy upon tragedy of these disabled and grieving people being gaslit, abandoned, told they have anxiety, and then, systematically censored and cut off from the online groups that were their lifeline.
I can share studies. And mechanisms of action. And more evidence of the havoc these injections can unleash upon the human body. And harm to children. More harm to children. And damage to fertility. And collections of studies. And more collections of studies. And the other group of silenced.
I can point to graphs showing higher all-cause mortality after COVID shots, which counters the claim that they save lives.
And a detailed critique of the often-repeated number “14 million lives saved” by these injections.
“Several issues were identified that generally invalidate its conclusions and raise doubts about the actual success of the global vaccination program. These include the use of inaccurate estimates of effectiveness and safety due to in adequate counting windows; lack of recognition of waning effectiveness and eventual negative effectiveness; failure to account for confounding variables; exaggerated infection and case fatality rates; insufficient consideration of vaccine-related risks; and possible financial or political conflicts of interest.” - Metacritique of Influential Studies Purporting COVID-19 Vaccine Successes: Part 1 – Watson et al
But nothing comes close to seeing the real human beings. Witnessing them experiencing similar pain, and similar ways of being treated horribly by the system they trusted, and by others who still trust those systems.
More here about how full of design flaws and bullshit the often-referred to “study” claiming the shots saved “millions of lives” was -
This is an excellent, heartbreaking film. It’s not opinion, it’s real people. Not “rare” data points.
Yet, I need to note one point of critique, that doesn’t change the film’s meaning. I don’t want to feed the “fact checkers” (although it looks, so far, like the media is just ignoring this. It shows their complicity in this crime against humanity, so likely they’ll continue to ignore it, or insult it).
Note on the DMED Data from the Department of Defense -
There are mentions in the film of a database of medical problems in military servicemembers. It’s true that after vaccination, illnesses, disabilities, and deaths increased, in all vaccinated populations. And being extremely athletic, members of the military were among the highest risk for adverse events.
The military whistleblowers are not lying about the injuries they observed, but there’s something off about that database, and it should not be taken on face value. Math / data genius Mathew Crawford has spent tremendous amounts of time going through the DMED data, and writes about it in many articles, including here.
But it’s *not necessary* to wrap your head around the DMED data saga to understand that downstream of these injections, real people, far more than we were told, experienced life destroying, and life ending, severe adverse events.
And it was whatever puppets “Biden”, that also puppets Harris - and not Trump, for all his flaws - who mandated that injection, forcing those who could least afford to loose their jobs to submit their bodies to a risky experiment.
That also weighs heavy on calculations of who to vote for, and who to vote against.
Trigger Warning
Sadly, I don’t mean the trigger of watching people with shaking, broken bodies, sharing the common experience of being told “it’s all in your head”. The film is not graphic, although there are heart-wrenching stories all throughout.
At 1:32, a name appears on the screen of a gifted filmmaker, who saw the humanity of the vaccine injured and helped to give them a voice.
But it’s a name that the media, the Wikipedia-Google- ”Fact-Checker”- cartel (it is a cartel) has poisoned in many minds. A name that may cause people to instantly look away.
Please don’t look away. This is not an opinion piece, it’s a documentary about suffering human beings and a system that abandoned and censored them, while lying to us all, pretending they didn’t exist.
In “Information, Permaculture, and Cooties”, I explain how Wikipedia is not at all a trustworthy source, especially not for anything like this. (“Beware the Wikipedia, etc, Trap”.)
I won’t re-hash all that here, but these links are from honest people who looked into the forensics of how Wikipedia edits are made. It’s not pretty.
‘How Wikipedia Defames and Delegitimizes Anybody Raising Concerns Against the WHO Narrative on Covid” - Mathematician Norman Fenton
“Wikipedia and a Pint of Gin” - Justus R. Hope, MD (as in, "Wikipedia is NOT reliable, and their information should be taken with a grain of salt and perhaps a pint of gin as well.")
As I’ve said before, I recognize that not everyone making films and writing articles against the narrative is always correct on everything - but the dissidents have been correct way more than the official narrative, which has been wrong about Every Aspect of the Covid Response, and much more.
Sometimes the people with the most formidable skills in getting information out have their reputations tarnished most brutally.
(This is also why every single thing Robert F Kennedy, Jr says is massively distorted by the media, to the point where they’ve left a humiliating trail of making fools of themselves. I haven’t yet written much about Kennedy, because there’s so many examples of where he’s been right yet the media frames him as meaning something different than he said, that if I begin this topic at the end of an article, intending to follow the info all the way down, the article will grow too long.)
When I can, I’ll write more about the actual statements by RFK, Jr vs. those who insult him with demonstrable lies, and the stupidity of the media distortions. (Such as framing it as “racist” to acknowledge that there are biological differences among how African Americans react to certain vaccines. Or saying, in unison, that he insulted Anne Frank and other Holocaust victims by stating that every tyrant in history has wanted the tech abilities we have today. (Like this - not a team Trump friendly article)).
Peter Marks is a perfect example of the type of person who, hiding behind the official narrative and a fawning press, pretends to be a victim of Kennedy’s “dangerous”, “misinformed” policies. But when the truth is followed down it shows, yet again, that the official narrative is cruelly wrong, and not at all scientific.
Secret Recordings: The Real Peter Marks. Peter Marks, the face of “it’s safe and effective!” at the FDA, was meeting (online, always online even when they traveled at great expense and physical toll to Washington, DC), with the vaccine injured, (badly) pretending to listen, while telling the world that they didn’t exist.
At least on topics of science and health, RFK Jr’s information can be followed down to the roots, which usually leads back to original documents from clinical trial data, package inserts, and government FOIA requests. Much of the same info Kennedy draws from is here (long, informative presentation, but the links referred to are posted after the video.) -
What Attorney Aaron Siri rests his, mostly successful, court cases on is the same evidence all of us can learn for ourselves. He says, (paraphrasing), “I’m just a lawyer. I just read.”
In other words, one does not need skills in medicine, nor medical theories, nor mathematical aptitude, to observe things like, “Section 6.1”, original clinical trial data - Infants in the trial were followed for five days.
It’s insulting to the common sense of the human race that we need “experts” to interpret for us that that five days is way too short to have a clue about the safety of any medical product. It’s fucked up, to say the least, that this shot is given on the first day of life, for protection from what IV drugs and promiscuous unprotected sex put you at risk of, yet it’s given to infants - whose mothers already tested negative for Hep B, and parents risk loosing their children over objecting to it.
And on that - Team Trump is, at least, less authoritarian than Team Mandate. The Trump government is less pharma-fascist, as far as the state, the media, three-letter agencies, medical journals and medical orgs operating as one force in service of one goal - getting people to accept a known-all-along to be dangerous medical product, and censoring and threatening those whose actions, information, and even actually safe and effective treatments, got in the way of that one goal.
Meanwhile, they were not “following the science”, as they claimed - they were hiding science, designing studies and questions to hide what they knew was there but didn’t want to find, gaslighting the injured and lying to the public, every day.
And that’s not a small thing.
This bears repeating:
** If you’re trying to make sense of why people who come from the left supported Kennedy, voted for Trump, and / or refused to vote for Harris, and you haven’t digested that the COVID vaccines are not just “not as effective as advertised, nor perfectly safe, and Pharma made too much money” - but bad enough where “crime against humanity” is *not* an exaggeration - you’re missing a momentous foundation of this inflection point / political inversion. **
The violations of informed consent and dangers of vaccines as they’re currently produced include points that are so glaring, they’re not hard for laypeople to understand.
Yet, as the narrative tells us every chance they get, with medical / scientific info, it’s helpful to have credentialed experts unpack details. What the official cast of sanctioned “experts” doesn’t want us to notice is that the side that’s skeptical of the narrative, the vaccine risk aware side, has gotten almost everything right, and is overflowing with people of integrity. From all over the world.
And the side that can’t see any of that, the side that assumes some of the most amazing, honorable humans on the planet are quack conspiracy theorists are certain they are Team Good.
They’re certain they are Team Good and the other side is Team Cruel, Racist, Deplorable, Bad.
The Team Good warriors minimize everything bad about what Democrats have done, including child trafficking and mandating a shot with screaming danger signals while abandoning the injured and insulting the doctors who took them seriously.
Yet they assume everyone not willing to vote for Harris sided with the oppressors against the vulnerable.
It’s fair enough to have a different way of assessing things … and I can’t know what the future will bring ... I don’t know which path would ultimately lead to more or less suffering, or healing … all I know is voting against Team Mandate / Team Weak Vetting for Child Sponsors is not necessarily a choice to side against the vulnerable.
In this fractured world, institutions and beliefs deserve to be questioned. Those who see the questions themselves as offensive are, knowingly or not, “Guardians of Decay” - (this is an excellent article about narrative control). The ones who scramble to strangle those questions have left a trail of getting everything wrong, and/ or covering for those who do.
The view that some of what The Bad Man has done at least has an element of reasonable re-balancing can co-exist with seeing him as a narcissist who takes everything too far, trampling on human rights in the process.
But when everything, no matter what it is, is interpreted as super-horrific-democracy-ending-crossing-of-red-lines,
it hinders one’s relationship to reality,'
it consumes the self-described Team Compassion with fantasies of murder and stochastic terrorism ~
Understanding the 'When It Happens' Trend Explained | TikTok
“When It Happens” Trend : r/nothinghappeninghere ,
it also justifies, in the mind of Team Compassion, the dehumanization, and potentially violence towards, anyone who doesn’t hate The Bad Man voraciously enough.
And instead of seriously looking at the frightening lines that may be crossed at the union of loss of civil liberties and the frontier of technocracy, or the unique, worthwhile science about to be lost to overzealous cancelling by those who don’t even understand the science they’re cancelling,
We argue about a silly picture of Trump as the Pope, or listen to the media defend the same corrupt players in the same excruciatingly biased ways and not notice how many times they’ve been wrong …
Giving to The Bad Man and Sabotaging Everything Else
Glenn Greenwald is a rare from the left journalist who is untethered to the official narrative, and capable of nuance + pragmatism. (He didn’t get covid right all along, from being misled himself, and the shot may have contributed to his husband’s terrible death). But Greenwald wasn’t part of the group-mind narrative that pushed mandates, and he saw through obvious lies in the narrative before then.
He speaks for what many see, even not really Trump fans - (I added the bold font)
"The problem that I have with Democrats for a long time is, one of the biggest gifts that they give to Trump is that they seem incapable, ever, of criticizing him without using maximalist language.
Everything is a threat to democracy. Everything is fascism. Everything is Nazi-like or Hitler-like or some sort of drastic deviation from the norm, even when that's not true. And that creates the Boy Who Cries Wolf syndrome.
I do think there are things the Trump administration is doing that are serious threats to basic civil liberties. We've talked about them a lot on this show.
But the reason I feel confident to talk about them is because I am not somebody who has or will ever just instantly react to everything the Trump administration does with this deranged kind of chicken running around with its head cut off rhetoric that a lot of Democrats instantly use.
And again, the problem is that if you call everything he does fascist or a threat to democracy, all the times he really does do those things, people will tune out that rhetoric.
It’s similar to overusing the racism accusation or the anti-Semitism accusation. If you just start throwing that around almost reflexively, people are going to tune it out so that when it really merits that term, it will have lost its impact. . .
And I say this as someone who believes there are very grave civil liberties threats that have been posed by certain Trump administration policies. This isn't one of them. (arresting a judge, not for a ruling she made that Trump didn't like, but for an actual crime) . . . But this is a case of actual criminal allegations based on an actual criminal statute that has been applied many times to many other people.
And to use this kind of rhetoric instantly without knowing anything just, again, is what does Trump the biggest favors, because then when people like me, who are much more restrained with this kind of rhetoric and try and be much more discriminating about when we raise civil liberties concerns - like when it's actually deserved, when it really is something unprecedented to try and convince people that it's true, a lot of people will understandably tune out because this is the kind of language Democrats have been using for 10 years against Trump, from the smallest and most trivial stories to the biggest to everything in between." - Glenn Greenwald, System Update (35:15)
This also costs the left credibility, and makes it harder to hear when they do have points …
And it breeds the worst dehumanizing way of thinking about half the country,
(Hindering collaboration, and making Team Compassion of the Good Left look like caricatures).
Conclusion, and Request
There are a zillion things happening in the world. These are not the only tragedies where innocent people’s lives are brutalized by the powers that shouldn’t be.
And there are other tragedies where innocent people’s lives are brutalized, that team Trump is doing and team Harris would not do.
But I highlighted the tragedies of children trafficked by the US government and its affiliated NGOs, and the vaccine injured, because of the common threads they share -
The “Biden” / Harris administration was more culpable in both these crimes against humanity.
Although Trump and his administration bears some responsibility for the COVID shots, the “Biden” / Harris team is more guilty. They lied about early treatment while Trump at least tried. “Biden” did the mandates, putting millions at risk, and Harris would have been way more likely than Trump to do something similar.
Now, the US government is no longer doing nearly the same thing with handing children off to whomever. And they are trying, perhaps not hard enough, but they are trying to locate the missing children.
If the COVID shots remain on the childhood schedule and recommended for pregnant women, it will be through deep swampy-forces.
These products need to be pulled altogether - they’re unique among vaccines in their massive capacity for harm. But that’s a difficult process, and this is a step.
Media coverage about (potential) Medicaid cuts won’t cover how much more vulnerable kids on Medicaid are to childhood illness and way-too-young deaths - because of the COVID vaccines being on the childhood schedule, which is what many Medicaid-accepting pediatricians follow religiously - or are forced to follow. Hopefully, the COVID shots will be off the childhood schedule any moment now. (If not, it’s not for lack of trying. The swamp runs deep. These shots are spectacular disasters, especially for children.)
“Most states, including California, require pediatricians who treat Medicare patients to enroll in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccines for Children Program.
The program requires doctors to administer all vaccines on the childhood immunization schedule to their Medicaid patients, regardless of the child’s health status or their parents’ wishes.” - The Defender
Common Ground?
Can we meet in an objective view that can criticize both Team Left and Team Right, and sees that there’s powers-that-shouldn’t-be at least over-influencing the pivot points of both parties?
It just makes sense, in an intuitive way, that criticisms are more easily heard when stated by those with a good track record, who can meet on the grounds that there’s some reasonableness to (some of) Team Trump’s actions and have the credibility and objectivity to point out when they go too far.
And this from evolutionary biologist Heather Heying, who is still liberal in heart and mind, but saw firsthand the corruption of the Blue Team and the un-science of the “#Follow The Science” crew -
“This week, I received the following letter. It is reprinted here with permission by the author, although he has asked to have his name redacted. I provide commentary after.
. . . I am an MD-PhD student at Harvard Medical School. . . I am also a three-time Trump voter . . . and as one among few conservatives at Harvard, I think my perspective is quite unique. . .My current research — at the intersection of artificial intelligence, kinase signaling, and mass spectrometry — aims to understand how cancer cells rewire signaling networks and how we might stop them. So many of cancer's complexities rest beyond what is immediately perceptible to us, making AI critical in redefining our understanding of this disease. . .
This week, I received word that the grant funding which supports my research — and that of countless other physician-scientists in training — has been terminated by the federal government.
In an unprecedented move, the Trump administration has abruptly ended NIH funding to Harvard Medical School, including . . . These cuts are not based on scientific merit, fiscal necessity, or public health priorities. They are political. And they threaten to unravel decades of progress. . .
The author and I exchanged several emails after he sent me this. He provided both more details on his research3, and moving words on the tragic early death of his mother. I am compelled that he is doing valuable and honest scientific work, and that his agreement with Harvard was contingent on Harvard’s agreements with NIH, which have been yanked through no fault of his own.
As the author of the letter says in a later communication with me,
Scientific funding is largely bloated and cuts are certainly necessary, but outright termination of funding across entire universities likely does more harm than good.
. . . And yet: actual science, science which is not beset with conflicts of interest or incompetence or fraud, is a beautiful, necessary human endeavor. And much of the value of scientific exploration is not in the form of obvious positive ramifications for human health or well-being. We can’t know what avenues may open up later as a result of basic research today. We cannot know. . .” - Heather Heying, Natural Selections
And, it’s worth noting that the independent media folks warning about political inversions - where the powers that play both sides make the people think the Red Team won for Freedom, but it’s the same oppression with different slogans - were right about a lot . . . there are technocratic plans from the left and the right.
Highly recommend the Last American Vagabond for reasons to not trust team Trump has our freedom and best interests at heart, but also sees through the lies of the narrative ~ (28) The Last American Vagabond Substack | Substack
And Catherine Austin-Fitts~
Prescient Warning -
And this, astute and, sadly, true to this day, although some pretend it didn’t happen, observation from Diane Perlman, another wise elder who is not fooled by either occupant of the White House. She said this in 2021 -
“Many Americans, gripped by existential fear and anxiety, are experiencing a new, shocking degree of hostile intolerance towards people who question the dominant US Covid narrative.
Lifelong friends, relatives and colleagues, people loved and admired for years or decades are suddenly deemed to be ignorant, deluded, reckless and dangerous because of one opinion. Formerly decent people assume the right to be hostile, insulting and rejecting.
. . . Fear shuts down higher level cognitive functions and people may regress to more primitive thoughts and emotions.
People are hardened in their continually polarizing belief systems. Many have absolute certainty about things they have never studied directly – even progressive intellectuals. They are sure that people who have studied in depth are completely wrong. Curiosity is dead. There is no complexity, nuance, dialogue or perspective taking.
How did it come to this? I do not think it has to be this way.
‘It is an act of evil to accept the state of evil as either inevitable or final.’
Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel
I do not believe that this conflict is arising from within us. Emotions and beliefs are being successfully manipulated by forces who benefit from our fight. There is no inherent psychological necessity for most people to hold some specific beliefs. Under other circumstances people might be willing and even eager to revise their opinions with new factual information. They could shift their anger away from each other and direct it towards the actual source of our suffering.”
That is still true, and especially necessary now …
Also, Mark Crispin Miller, CJ Hopkins, Toby Rogers, Joshua Stylman, Naomi Wolf, Charles Eisenstein, Derrick Broze, James Corbett, and more, all are bursting with integrity, insights, good track records of getting things right, and loyalty to truth, not at all to Team Trump, even if some saw them as part of a process of defeating whatever forced children into slavery and stuff they knew wasn’t safe into as many bodies as they could. All see reasons to remain vigilant now, and definitely not just trust that Team Mandate was defeated, because over-reach can come in many forms.
But if we’re dehumanizing each other and looking wherever the mainstream media wants us to look, we may miss the bigger picture.
At least, there were reasons to assume, in the narrow, not-good choices we had, that some less suffering of the vulnerable would come from voting against those who opened the border and mandated the shots.
It’s fair enough to disagree, just please don’t assume those who saw as I’ve written about here sided with the oppressor against the vulnerable.
Thanks for reading … if you’d like, please share your thoughts in the comments …
===
This so-funny satire article, Gay Pride Parade Sets Mainstream Acceptance of Gays Back 50 Years, back when The Onion was bold, is basically accurate for what’s become normalized, that wanting to keep children away from is (always, true or not) framed as bigotry and exclusion. Sometimes it’s that, but more than it seems it’s about respecting the innocence of childhood. And also about the validity of being gender non-conforming / same-sex attracted without having to confuse mind and body with hormones and surgeries. But that’s another topic for another day.
(I don’t condone any racism, and I don’t deny there’s good at the heart of social/racial justice attempts at re-balancing a history of dehumanization based on race … but that, like other things, have gone too far, and in this cultural group-mind, white guilt, as well as racism toward white people is considered acceptable and is a bit out of hand).
There may now be more attention given to some long-ignored, health-harming pollutants, including aluminum and electromagnetic radiation. But allowing more air and water pollution, + the fantasy of creating plenty of energy to use, and export, and also use for unlimited AI data centers can cause other health problems, for us and this living planet. This is a main reason I saw RFK Jr as the only possible path towards an ethical government (if that’s even possible given all that’s behind the scenes). (If you believe the media’s negative characterization of Kennedy, I can say with certainty, you’re listening to dishonest news.) Now, we have President “stay away from that ‘liquid gold’, Bobby!”, while we averted an administration that just proved it was pathologically obsessed with injecting pollutants directly into our bodies.
Well done! Thank you for this. I would only add that the Left has gone a bit off the deep end, and I say this as a life-long Democrat. Here's an article that expresses this view: https://slaynews.com/news/white-house-democrats-never-more-radical-out-touch-needs-american-people/
Fantastic article. Deserves to be read widely. I restacked